SmartBrief
0
Confirm favorite deletion?
Criminal Law Keyed to Abrams
United States v. Woodward
Citation:
469 U.S. 105, 105 S.Ct. 611, 83 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985)Facts
Woodward (Defendant) was accused of lying to customs officials about whether he was carrying over $5000 when he entered the U.S from Brazil. Woodward checked “no” on a form asking whether he was carrying over $5000, but a search by customs officials revealed that he and his wife were carrying around $22,000 in their clothing. He was convicted of making false statements to government officials, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. The Ninth Circuit held that Woodward’s conduct should instead have been punished under 31 U.S.C. § 1058 so it vacated the initial conviction.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
Topic Resources
10m 5sTopic Outline 