SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Evidence Keyed to Best
United States v. Krapp
Citation:
815 F.2d 1183 (8th Cir. 1987)Facts
The defendant was the postmaster of Pocahontas, Iowa. It was eventually discovered that the defendant did not report a stamp shortage in the required postal forms. The defendant was charged with three counts of making false records with intent to defraud the U.S.
At trial, the defendant presented a character witness who testified that the defendant had a reputation as an honest, trustworthy person. On cross-examination, the prosecution asked the witness whether they were aware that the defendant’s husband had omitted cash income on the Krapss’ joint tax returns and that the defendant was aware of the omissions. The defense objected and asked for a mistrial. The district court sustained the objection but refused to grant a mistrial. The defendant was later convicted.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.