SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Evidence Keyed to Sklansky
United States v. Hickey
Citation:
917 F.2d 901 (6th Cir. 1990)Facts
Hickey (Appellant) was charged with conspiracy to distribute cocaine and the use of a communication facility to facilitate a crime. After a mistrial due to a hung jury in his first trial, Hickey was retried and found guilty on one conspiracy charge and two communications charges. The investigation that led to Hickey’s conviction was centered on the testimony of Jack Ventimiglia, a key witness against Hickey, whose competence as a witness was questioned due to his cocaine addiction and inconsistencies in his testimony. However, the district court found substantial circumstantial evidence supporting Hickey’s involvement in the drug distribution network. Hickey was convicted of the charges.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
Topic Resources
9m 7sTopic Outline 
Topic Charts & Notes 