SmartBrief
0
Confirm favorite deletion?
Evidence Keyed to Sklansky
United States v. Freeman
Citation:
730 F.3d 590 (6th Cir. 2013)Facts
Freeman (Appellant) was charged with crimes based on his involvement in a murder-for-hire conspiracy. At trial, the government’s evidence included phone conversations involving Freeman and his co-defendant, who allegedly hired Freeman to kill the victim. The government called FBI Agent Scott Lucas to testify as an expert witness about his impressions of the phone calls. However, Lucas’s interpretations repeatedly reminded the jury of the government’s theory of the case. Freeman objected to Lucas’s testimony, asserting that it went beyond Lucas’s expert qualifications. The government responded that Lucas was testifying as a lay witness. The district court ruled that Lucas’s testimony was admissible, and Freeman was convicted by the jury
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
Topic Resources
9m 7sTopic Outline 
Topic Refresher Course 