SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Criminal Law Keyed to Osler
United States v. Dvorkin
Citation:
799 F.3d 867 (7th Cir. 2015)Facts
Dvorkin was upset about a $8 million judgement entered against him from his lender, Larry Meyer. After the judgement was entered Defendant called Robert Bevis who owned a firearm store, asking to chat. In person, Defendant asked Bevis if he knew anyone who would murder for hire. Bevis said yes, he knew somebody from Florida, though that was not true in order to end the conversation. Defendant gave him the Linkedin profile of Meyer and said his budget was $50,000. Bevis left and told the police about the interaction who told the FBI. Bevis agreed to cooperate with the FBI.
At another meeting towards the end of April, Bevis said the cost of the hit would be $80,000, half due upfront and half due after. Defendant agreed and then later asked if he could negotiate for just $50,000. Bevis then said the hitman would do it for the $50,000. Defendant then told Bevis a week later that he found somebody who would do it for $20,000. Bevis, at the direction of the FBI, told Defendant that his guy would do it for the lower price. Defendant rejected the offer and said he was going to pursue the other route. The FBI placed the Meyer family on 24/7 surveillance and told the Defendant that they were aware of his plot and if Meyer was harmed he would be the first suspect.
A week later Defendant met with Bevis, and told him about what the FBI said. He searched on Bevis’ computer for Meyer’s whereabouts but did not find any reports on him being dead. Defendant was then arrested.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.