SmartBrief
0
Confirm favorite deletion?
Criminal Law Keyed to Osler
United States v. Camp
Citation:
343F. 3d 743 (5th Cir. 2003)Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Law enforcement had a warrant to search the defendant’s home for firearms, illegal drugs, and drug manufacturing equipment. In this search officers found an electric-operated trigger mechanism. When added to a firearm, behind the original trigger, it supplied electrical power to continue to fire until the shooter released the electric trigger or the ammunition loaded was all used. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) tested the weapon and found that it was capable of firing more than one shot without manually reloading by just pulling the electric trigger. They found it to be a machine gun under the relevant statute. Defendant was charged under that statute but dismissed an after an evidentiary hearing where the district court found that the device did not meet the definition of a machine gun.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
10m 5s
