SmartBrief
0
Confirm favorite deletion?
Constitutional Law Keyed to Chemerinsky
Trump v. Vance
Citation:
591 U.S. ___ (2020)Facts
In 2019, the New York County District Attorney, Cyrus Vance, Jr., issued a grand jury subpoena to Mazars USA, LLP, President Trump’s personal accounting firm, seeking financial records including tax returns. The subpoena was part of a criminal investigation into potential violations of New York state law. President Trump filed suit in federal court seeking to block the subpoena, arguing that a sitting president enjoys absolute immunity from state criminal processes. Trump contended that compliance with the subpoena would impair his ability to discharge his constitutional duties. The District Attorney countered that the President was not entitled to immunity for his private conduct and that the subpoena was directed to a third party for records unrelated to official presidential duties.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
8m 0s
