Confirm favorite deletion?
Contracts Keyed to Blum
Trinity Homes, LLC v. Fang
Citation:Not reported in S.E.2d, 63 Va. Cir. 409, 2003 WL 22699791 (2003)
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Plaintiffs, Trinity Homes, and Seabring Development, with their agent, Stewart, attempted to enter into an agreement with Defendants, Ching Seng Fang and Carol S. Fang, and their agent, Nicholson for the sale of the Defendant’s property. When attempting to accept the offer to sell, Stweart allegedly placed the Agreement for Purchase & Sale of Real Estate (Agreement) in his facsimile machine, dialed Nicholson’s number, pushed the button to send, and went on an errand. However, there was no verification that a facsimile was transmitted and/or that Nicholson received it. Soon after, Nicholson called Stewart to tell him that Defendants did not wish to sell their property nor enter into an agreement with Plaintiffs. As a result, plaintiffs filed suit against Defendants.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.