Confirm favorite deletion?
Constitutional Law Keyed to Farber
The Civil Rights Cases
Citation:109 U.S. 3 (1883)
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
The last federal civil rights statute adopted during Reconstruction, the Civil Rights Act of 1875, provided that all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States, regardless of race or color, should without discrimination enjoy any and all public accommodations, such as inns and restaurants. Violation of the statute was a misdemeanor, and persons whose rights were violated could recover $500 for every offense. It was conceded that congress lacked any such power to pass the 1875 Act under Article I. The Court rejected an argument based on section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court understood section 1 of the Amendment only to reach state action, not private action like that of the defendants in this case. Accordingly, the Court reasoned, section 5’s authorization of legislative power to enforce section 1 allows Congress to adopt appropriate legislation for correcting the effects of such prohibited state law and state acts, and thus to render them effectually null, void and innocuous. In two cases, individuals of color were denied accommodations and privileges of an inn or hotel and refused by the conductor of the railroad company to allow the wife to ride in the ladies’ car for the reason that she was a person of African descent.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.