Confirm favorite deletion?
Contracts Keyed to Dawson
Sunnyland Farms, Inc. v. Central New Mexico Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Citation:301 P.3d 387.
Sunnyland was a hydroponic tomato facility that purchased its electricity from CNMEC. On September 8, 2003, CNMEC shut off Sunnyland’s electrical service without the required 15 day notice due to non-payment. The following day, Sunnyland employees were welding when they started a fire. The employees attempted to put out the fire, but there was no running water due to the power cut. When the fire department arrived, it was unable to access well water. Firefighters contacted CNMEC to restore electricity to the well, but the CNMEC employee expressed reservations. Despite the use of reservoir water and foam to attempt to extinguish the fire, Sunnyland’s packhouse and operations building were destroyed.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
Parties:Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
Procedural Posture & History:Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
Rule of Law:Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
Facts:What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.
Issue(s):Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
Holding:Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
Reasoning and Analysis:Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.