Confirm favorite deletion?
Criminal Procedure Keyed to Miller
State v. Ahmad Bey
Citation:17 P.3d 322 (Kan. 2001)
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Ahmad Bey (defendant) and his brother Yusif were charged with the premeditated first-degree murder of Victor Conger. During plea negotiations, the county attorney informed the brothers that any plea agreement would need to dispose of the cases against both brothers and would have to be concluded prior to the time the prosecution would be turned over to the attorney general’s office. Ahmad agreed to plead nolo contendere to aiding and abetting intentional second-degree murder with a life sentence, while Yusif agreed to plead to first-degree felony murder with a life sentence.
At the plea hearing, defense counsel and the trial judge questioned Ahmad about his understanding of and voluntariness in entering into the plea agreement. However, there was no mention that disposal of both cases was a condition of the plea agreements. Ahmad moved to withdraw his plea, arguing that the judge’s failure to inquire about the package deal rendered his plea involuntary because the situation was coercive.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.