SmartBrief
0
Confirm favorite deletion?
Criminal Law Keyed to Kennedy
State of Vermont v. James Riley
Citation:
442 A.2d 1297 (1982)Facts
On October 20, 1979, the defendant pulled over in the breakdown lane of the highway and was seated in the driver’s seat when an officer pulled up behind him and approached his vehicle. The defendant stated that he had a leg cramp, which he was massaging at the time.
During a routine check of the car from the outside, the officer noticed a handgun on the seat beside the defendant, its barrel pointed toward the passenger door. Opening the door on the defendant’s side of the vehicle, the officer asked the defendant to put both hands on the steering wheel, which the defendant did, and then to get out of the car, which he refused to do.
The officer then ordered the defendant out of the car, and as he did so the defendant dropped his hand from the steering wheel and reached toward the gun. The officer drew his gun. The defendant replied “everything is cool, don’t shoot,” and brushed the gun along the seat until he could place it on the floor in front of the passenger’s place. He then got out of the car.
The defendant was arrested and charged with attempting to put another in fear of serious bodily injury. At trial the officer testified that he had been frightened by the defendant’s conduct, and had feared for his life. He said that there was a point at which he could not see the defendant’s hand because it was down in front of the seat, and he “knew the gun was with the hand” and “didn’t know what the story was.”
The defendant testified that he slid the gun across the seat of the car and eased it to the floor in an effort to eliminate any possibility that the officer would see it and become so excited that he would shoot the defendant out of fear.
The defendant was convicted. He appealed, arguing that the evidence did not constitute an attempt because he did intend to scare the officer.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
Topic Resources
15m 13sTopic Outline 
Topic Refresher Course 