Confirm favorite deletion?
Property Keyed to Saxer
Spur Industries, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Development Co.
Citation:108 Ariz. 178
CaseCast™ – "What you need to know"
In 1911, the Spur family began farming the area. In 1950, the Youngstown Retirement community was started nearby. In 1956 the Spur Family developed cattle feedlots to supplement their operation. In 1959, Webb began the Sun City residential development and a year later Spur industries purchased land to rebuild and expand their feedlot. In 1960, Webb began offering homes over 10 miles from the feedlot, but over time the lots offered were as little as 500 feet from the feedlot. According to Webb, 1300 lots in his development were unusable due to the proximity to the feedlot, and thereafter Webb brought this suit.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
Parties:Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
Procedural Posture & History:Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
Rule of Law:Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
Facts:What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.
Issue(s):Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
Holding:Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
Reasoning and Analysis:Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.