SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Torts keyed to Best
Slayton v. McDonald
Citation:
690 So.2d 914 (La. Ct. App. 1997)Facts
James Slayton and Daniel McDonald lived close to one another and rode the same bus home from their schools. On the way home, the two had a disagreement. During the disagreement, Slayton threatened to come to McDonald’s house. Slayton had a reputation for fighting and was larger than McDonald, so McDonald told him not to come. After McDonald arrived at his house, he went outside and saw Slayton walking towards the house. McDonald told Slayton to stay away from the home, which Slayton ignored.
In response to Slayton’s aggressive statements and refusal to leave his driveway, McDonald went into his home and retrieved a shotgun. McDonald once again asked Slayton to leave and Slayton refused. At this point, McDonald retreated into his home and called 911. While McDonald was on the call, Slayton entered McDonald’s home. McDonald pointed the gun at Slayton and once again asked him to leave, in response to which Slayton threatened to fight McDonald. At one point, McDonald stated that he would count to three and then shoot Slayton, to which Slayton began counting himself. At this point, McDonald shot Slayton in the leg. Slayton was severely injured and his family incurred significant expenses relating to the injury. The Slayton family brought suit against the McDonalds for battery.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
Topic Resources
Topic Outline
Intentional Torts