SmartBrief
0
Confirm favorite deletion?
Contracts Keyed to Kuney
Salsbury v. Northwestern Bell Telephone
Citation:
221 N.W.2d 609 (1974).Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Plaintiff was the first and only chairman of Charles City College, a college that was proposed to be built in Charles City, Iowa. A professional fund raiser negotiated with Daryl V. Winder, a manager for defendant, for a subscription from defendant. Winder failed to use the pledge card from the kit of forms provided to him and, instead, wrote a letter to the fund raiser stating that the defendant would contribute $15,000 over a three year period with the first payment to be made in 1968. The letter was treated by all parties the same as a pledge card. The plaintiff executed a personal guaranty in order to gain credit with the subscriptions securing the obligation. The college failed after a short period of operation and prior to any payment being made on the defendant’s subscription.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
12m 9s
