SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
California Legal Ethics Keyed to Wydick, 12th Ed.
Ruskin v. Rodgers
Citation:
79 Ill.App.3d 941, 35 Ill.Dec. 557, 399 N.E.2d 623 (1979)Facts
In May 1977, Rodgers learned about a luxury apartment building for sale at 1550 North State Parkway for $2.7 million. He approached Ruskin to discuss jointly acquiring and converting the building to condominiums. On June 16, 1977, they signed a memorandum of understanding agreeing to work together to purchase and convert the building, with profits to be split 50/50. They pursued various financing options, including working with John Wendlund. On July 15, 1977, without Rodgers’ knowledge, Ruskin’s attorney made an inquiry to the seller’s representative about accepting $2.5 million instead of $2.7 million. This inquiry was rejected, and Rodgers was told the deal was dead. Rodgers then contacted Robert Sheridan, who agreed to purchase the building. Rodgers claimed he terminated his agreement with Ruskin, while Ruskin maintained they continued to discuss the Sheridan deal with the understanding they would share in the profits. Sheridan ultimately purchased the property, and Rodgers received compensation for his role in the transaction.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.