Confirm favorite deletion?
Torts Keyed to Prosser
Richardson v. Chapman
Citation:175 Ill.2d 98, 221 Ill.Dec. 818, 676 N.E.2d 621
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Keva Richardson was a 23-year old college graduate who worked as a flight attendant with American Airlines. She met Ann McGregor during the flight attendant training program. The two became roommates and moved to the Chicago area after the completion of their training. One evening, Richardson drove with McGregor as her passenger. Their car was stopped at a traffic light when it was suddenly struck from behind by a semi-trailer drive by Chapman. Both Richardson and McGregor were injured as a result of the collision. Richardson’s spinal cord was severely damaged, resulting in quadriplegia, or paralysis from the neck down. At trial, the jury awarded Richardson $22,358,814 in damages for past and future medical care, disability, disfigurement, and pain and suffering. McGregor was awarded $102,215 for past medical expenses, lost earnings, and pain and suffering. Chapman challenged the amount of damages awarded to the plaintiffs. Specifically, he contended the jury awarded Richardson $1.5 million more for future medical costs than the figure estimated at trial by Richardson’s expert. The intermediate appellate court rejected Chapman’s challenge. He appealed to the Supreme Court of Illinois.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.