SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Contracts Keyed to Blum
Polytop Corporation v. Chipsco, Inc.
Citation:
826 A.2d 945 (2003)Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
In January 1999, Chipsco gave Polytop a quote for a specific mold. Three weeks later, Polytop ordered some. In August 1999, Polytop ordered a second type of mold based on an April 1, 1999 quote. In the “terms and conditions” portions of Chipsco’s quotes were arbitration agreements. Polytop believed both molds were delivered late and were low quality. Polytop brought a claim for a breach of contract, but Chipsco argues that the contract included a clause stating that all contract disputes should be resolved through arbitration. Polytop claims that this was not part of the contract because its purchase orders included a phrase stating: “Please enter our order for the following subject to the terms and conditions below and attached hereto and made a part hereof. Any additional or different terms proposed by seller are rejected unless expressly assented to in writing by buyer’s authorized agent.” Polytop claims that this language and the lack of any express agreement of such a clause, amounted to a rejection of the arbitration clause.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
8m 21s
