SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Criminal Law Keyed to Weaver
Pinkerton v. United States
Citation:
328 U.S. 640 (1946)ProfessorScott Caron
CaseCast™ – "What you need to know"
Facts
Petitioners lived in close proximity to each other on Daniel’s farm. Petitioners were indicted for 10 substantive counts and 1 conspiracy count. The jury found Walter guilty of 9 of the substantive counts and of the conspiracy count. The jury found Daniel guilty of 6 of the substantive counts and of the conspiracy count. Petitioners contend that merger should apply.
Daniel was in prison for most of time when Walter committed the substantive crimes. There was no evidence that Daniel knew of, advised, or counseled Walter about the substantive crimes. The only evidence there is is that the two had conspired about the crimes. Daniel contends there is not enough evidence to support his conviction.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.