• Law Study Aids
    • Case Briefs
    • Lessons
      • 1L
        • Civil Procedure
        • Constitutional Law
        • Contracts
        • Criminal Law
        • Property Law
        • Torts
      • 2L/3L
        • Business Associations
        • Criminal Procedure
        • Evidence
        • Family Law
        • Secured Transactions
        • Wills, Trusts & Estates
    • Outlines
      • 1L
        • Civil Procedure
        • Constitutional Law
        • Contracts
        • Criminal Law
        • Property Law
        • Torts
      • 2L/3L
        • Agency
        • Business Associations
        • Conflicts of Law
        • Corporations
        • Criminal Procedure
        • Evidence
        • Family Law
        • Partnerships
        • Secured Transactions
      • Exam Prep Checklists
        • Access 1L Checklists
          • Civil Procedure
          • Constitutional Law
          • Contracts
          • Criminal Law
          • Property Law
          • Torts
        • Access 2L/3L Checklists
          • Agency
          • Criminal Procedure
          • Corporations/Business Entities
          • Evidence
          • Family Law
          • Partnership
          • Trusts
          • U.C.C. ART. 9
          • Wills
    • Refresher Courses
      • 1L
        • Constitutional Law
        • Contracts Law
        • Criminal Law
        • Property Law
        • Torts Law
      • 2L/3L
        • Criminal Procedure
        • Evidence Law
    • Issue Spotting Essays
      • 1L
        • Civil Procedure
        • Constitutional Law
        • Contracts
        • Criminal Law
        • Property Law
        • Torts
      • 2L/3L
        • Criminal Procedure
        • Evidence
    • Multiple Choice Quizzes
      • 1L
        • Civil Procedure
        • Constitutional Law
        • Contracts
        • Criminal Law
        • Property Law
        • Torts
      • 2L/3L
        • Criminal Procedure
        • Evidence
    • Exam Prep Workshops
      • 1L
        • Civil Procedure
        • Constitutional Law
        • Contracts
        • Criminal Law
        • Property Law
        • Torts
    • Charts and Notes
      • 1L
        • Civil Procedure
        • Constitutional Law
        • Contracts
        • Criminal Law
        • Property Law
        • Torts
      • 2L/3L
        • Criminal Procedure
        • Evidence
  • Courses
    • Practice Ready Workshop
    • 1L Prep Course
    Generic selectors
    Exact matches only
    Search in title
    Search in content
    Search in posts
    Search in pages
    Advanced Search | Notes Search
    Start My FREE 7-DAY Trial
    Log In
    StuddyBuddy Pro
    Apple
    Facebook
    Google

    Forgot Password?

    Forgotten Password

    Cancel

    Register For This Site

    Group Poor Marked

    User Access

    Apple
    Facebook
    Google

    A password will be e-mailed to you. Cancel

    Generic selectors
    Exact matches only
    Search in title
    Search in content
    Search in posts
    Search in pages

    • Law Study Aids
      • Case Briefs
      • Lessons
        • 1L
          • Civil Procedure
          • Constitutional Law
          • Contracts
          • Criminal Law
          • Property Law
          • Torts
        • 2L/3L
          • Business Associations
          • Criminal Procedure
          • Evidence
          • Family Law
          • Secured Transactions
          • Wills, Trusts & Estates
      • Outlines
        • 1L
          • Civil Procedure
          • Constitutional Law
          • Contracts
          • Criminal Law
          • Property Law
          • Torts
        • 2L/3L
          • Agency
          • Business Associations
          • Conflicts of Law
          • Corporations
          • Criminal Procedure
          • Evidence
          • Family Law
          • Partnerships
          • Secured Transactions
        • Exam Prep Checklists
          • Access 1L Checklists
            • Civil Procedure
            • Constitutional Law
            • Contracts
            • Criminal Law
            • Property Law
            • Torts
          • Access 2L/3L Checklists
            • Agency
            • Criminal Procedure
            • Corporations/Business Entities
            • Evidence
            • Family Law
            • Partnership
            • Trusts
            • U.C.C. ART. 9
            • Wills
      • Refresher Courses
        • 1L
          • Constitutional Law
          • Contracts Law
          • Criminal Law
          • Property Law
          • Torts Law
        • 2L/3L
          • Criminal Procedure
          • Evidence Law
      • Issue Spotting Essays
        • 1L
          • Civil Procedure
          • Constitutional Law
          • Contracts
          • Criminal Law
          • Property Law
          • Torts
        • 2L/3L
          • Criminal Procedure
          • Evidence
      • Multiple Choice Quizzes
        • 1L
          • Civil Procedure
          • Constitutional Law
          • Contracts
          • Criminal Law
          • Property Law
          • Torts
        • 2L/3L
          • Criminal Procedure
          • Evidence
      • Exam Prep Workshops
        • 1L
          • Civil Procedure
          • Constitutional Law
          • Contracts
          • Criminal Law
          • Property Law
          • Torts
      • Charts and Notes
        • 1L
          • Civil Procedure
          • Constitutional Law
          • Contracts
          • Criminal Law
          • Property Law
          • Torts
        • 2L/3L
          • Criminal Procedure
          • Evidence
    • Courses
      • Practice Ready Workshop
      • 1L Prep Course
    Start My FREE 7-DAY Trial
    Log In Sign up
    StuddyBuddy Pro
    Apple
    Facebook
    Google

    Forgot Password?

    Forgotten Password

    Cancel

    Register For This Site

    Group Poor Marked

    User Access

    Apple
    Facebook
    Google

    A password will be e-mailed to you. Cancel

    SmartBrief enables case brief popups that define Key Terms, Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises used in this case.
    SmartBrief
    A.I Enhanced Margin Brief to quickly recall case brief A.I Enhanced Margin Brief to quickly recall case brief 0
    Sections to print




    To print, please Start a Free Trial or Log in.
    Confirm favorite deletion?
    Cancel Yes, Delete

    Criminal Law Keyed to Ohlin

    People v. Breton

    Citation:
    237 Ill. App. 3d 355, 603 N.E.2d 1290 (1992)

    Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*

    Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.

    *Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue

    • The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
    • Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
    • Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
    • Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
    • Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
    • Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
    Start Your Free Trial or Log in.
    • The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
    • Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
    • Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
    • Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:

      The defendant sold cocaine to Gary Wehrmeister multiple times. Wehrmeister agreed to work with the authorities and testify against the defendant at trial. A fellow inmate of the defendant told the State’s Attorney’s office that the defendant was looking for a hitman to kill Wehrmeister.

      The State’s Attorney’s office implemented a plan to allow the defendant to contact an undercover investigator, Callahan, posing as a hitman.

      The defendant first called Callahan on June 15, 1989. Defendant told him “I gotta have a job done” and that the job involved a guy named Wehrmeister. Defendant told Callahan that “I want him out. I only got about five days. He goes to trial . . . He’s gotta go.” Defendant indicated that Wehrmeister had set him up for a drug charge, that he was not guilty, but that he did not want to take a chance of Wehrmeister testifying against him.

      The defendant agreed to pay Callahan $5,000 up front and stated that he would need a day to make arrangements for the delivery of the money. He called him again the next day to tell him that the money was coming from out of town and that Callahan could pick it up from Ken Drost, an attorney, at his downtown Chicago office. Callahan told defendant when you are “payin’ me to kill somebody I need to know everything I can.” In response, defendant told Callahan where Wehrmeister lived, discussed Wehrmeister’s habits, and described Wehrmeister’s living arrangements.

      Defendant called Callahan again on June 19, 1989. He told him that the money was now available and gave him Drost’s phone number. He told him that Callahan should tell Drost that he was an investigator working on something for the defendant if Drost asked what the money was for.

      At defendant’s request, defendant’s wife had sent $ 2,500 in the form of a money order to Drost. On June 20, 1989, Callahan went to Drost’s office and met Drost. At that time Drost endorsed the money order and delivered it to Callahan for the defendant.

      Defendant made his fourth call to Callahan on June 21, 1989. Callahan told defendant he received the money order from Drost and said that he was concerned that a paper trail had been established. Defendant replied that he had told Drost to cash the money order and give Callahan cash. Callahan told defendant Wehrmeister’s murder was “set for tonight.” Defendant told Callahan he could pick up the rest of the money from Drost the next day.

      On June 22, 1989, a different investigator talked to the defendant by phone when the defendant called the undercover phone number and asked for Callahan. The investigator told the defendant he was working with Callahan. The defendant asked if he knew whether Wehrmeister had gone to court and the investigator replied that the had not. The defendant said “Good” and asked whether Wehrmeister was taken care of. The investigator answered yes and said that Wehrmeister would never go to court. The defendant said the rest of the money would be available on Friday.

      At his trial, defendant contended he did not really intend to have Wehrmeister murdered. He testified that he knew the hit man was a phony he went along with the scheme knowing no one would really be hurt. The defendant was then convicted of solicitation of murder for hire and sentenced to a term of 30 years imprisonment. He appealed, arguing that the State failed to prove the “agreement” element of solicitation of murder for hire.

    • Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
    • Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
    • Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
    • Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
    Start Your Free Trial or Log in.
    • The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
    • Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
    • Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
    Start Your Free Trial or Log in.

    MarginBrief™ Case overview for optimal recall

    A.I Enhanced Margin Brief to quickly recall case brief
    A.I Enhanced Margin Brief to quickly recall case brief

    Generating...

    Facts:
    Quickly review the Facts of this case including its key ideas for optimal understanding and recall.

    Quickly review the Facts of this case including its key ideas for optimal understanding and recall.

    Issue:
    Utilize our powerful A.I. tools to easily capture and understand the Issue in this case.

    Utilize our powerful A.I. tools to easily capture and understand the Issue in this case.

    Rule:
    Easily understand the Rule in this case so you have a complete and thorough appreciation for overall case concepts completely tying together what occurred, the court’s questions and the case outcome.

    Easily understand the Rule in this case so you have a complete and thorough appreciation for overall case concepts completely tying together what occurred, the court’s questions and the case outcome.

    Start Your Free Trial or Log in.

    Topic Resources

    Topic Videos

    People v. Breton4m 13s
    See complete Lesson, Quizzes and More
    People v. Breton10m 19s
    See complete Lesson, Quizzes and More

    Topic Refresher Course

    Conspiracy; Introduction to Homicide and Murder Part 1

    Status:

    Status:

    Your Law School
    Success Begins Here

    • Case Briefs - the Socratic Savior! – Best in class and Largest Library of complete I.R.A.C. / C.R.E.A.C. Law School case briefs. Includes:
      • SmartBriefs® - Enhanced case briefs for optimal clarity
      • CaseCast® - Professor overviews of "What you need to know"
      • New MarginBrief® - A.I. - Powered for faster, more efficient case recall
    • Lessons - Professor delivered video for topic reinforcement
    • Outlines - Professor written - downloadable, amendable and includes test-taking tips and tools
    • Refresher Courses - Quick course reviews with interactive exercises
    • Quizzes and Exams - over 5,000 Multiple Choice and Essay questions all Professor curated and answered
    • Exam Prep Workshops - Delivered by Professors on how to disect, organize and answer law school exam questions
    • and so much more ...
    Start your FREE Trial

    Notepad Click anywhere in notepad to add a note

    People v. Breton