Confirm favorite deletion?
Torts keyed to Best
People Express Airlines, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Citation:100 N.J. 246, 495 A.2d 107 (1985)
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
BASF Wyandotte Company (BASF) manufactured ethylene oxide that was transported in railway cars. Due to a rail yard accident at Consolidated Railway Corp. (Conrail), ethylene oxide escaped from one of the cars and ignited into a chemical fire. Due to the extreme flammability of ethylene oxide and possibility of an expolosion, a one-mile radius around the facility was evacuated for twelve hours, including the North terminal at the Newark airport. People Express Airways (People Express), a business operated out of the North terminal at the Newark airport, was forced to close down operations for that twelve-hour period.
People Express sued BASF and Conrail for economic losses, claiming that their negligent acts were the cause of its economic injury. The trial court granted summary judgment for the defendants on grounds that one is not liable for negligent acts that merely cause economic harm. The plaintiffs appealed and the Court of Appeals reversed. The defendants appealed.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.