Confirm favorite deletion?
Torts keyed to Best
Peete v. Blackwell
Citation:504 So. 2d 222 (Ala. 1986)
Dr. Peete was treating a hospitalized patient for severe bleeding from the patient’s nose. While attempting to quell the bleeding and stop blood from accumulating in the patient’s throat, Dr. Peete struck Nurse Blackwell on the forearm and demanded she “turn on the goddamn suction.” Nurse Blackwell was not injured or physically harmed by the action. As a result of this altercation, Nurse Blackwell filed a suit for assault and battery. She sought $1.00 in compensatory damages and $100,000 in punitive damages. On the day of the altercation, Dr. Peete had insulted hospital staff, was “yelling and hollering”, and threw a patient’s chart across a desk. At trial, Nurse Blackwell was awarded $10,000 in punitive damages.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
Parties:Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
Procedural Posture & History:Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
Rule of Law:Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
Facts:What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.
Issue(s):Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
Holding:Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
Reasoning and Analysis:Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.