SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Business Associations Keyed to Coffee, 9th Ed.
Patrick v. Alacer Corp.
Citation:
167 Cal. App. 4th 995, 84 Cal. Rptr. 642 (2008)Facts
Plaintiff Ymelda Patrick and her late husband founded Alacer Corporation in the mid-1970s to manufacture vitamin supplements. They created the formulas, served as corporate officers, and financially supported the company during their marriage. The company became successful, particularly due to its Emergen-C vitamin C supplement, reaching a market value of $70 million or more. In 2000, plaintiff’s husband transferred all Alacer shares to the James W. Patrick Revocable Trust, which became Alacer’s sole shareholder of record. The Trust directed the trustees to distribute up to 46 percent of the Trust’s Alacer stock to plaintiff upon her husband’s death to satisfy any community property interest she might have.
In February 2003, while plaintiff’s husband was gravely ill, three of the five trustees (Ronald Patrick, James Turner, and Thaddeus Smith—the “Director defendants”) sought to place themselves on Alacer’s board. They allegedly represented to plaintiff that they would serve only as interim directors and accept minimal compensation. Relying on these representations, plaintiff voted for them. Shortly after plaintiff’s husband died, the Director defendants removed plaintiff as an officer, terminated her salary and benefits, and allegedly began misappropriating corporate assets.
Plaintiff filed suit asserting both direct and derivative claims. Alacer demurred to the complaint, arguing that plaintiff lacked standing to bring derivative claims and that her causes of action were insufficiently pleaded. The trial court sustained the demurrer without leave to amend.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.