SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Criminal Law Keyed to Ohlin
Oxendine v. State
Citation:
528 A.2d 870 (1987)ProfessorScott Caron
CaseCast™ – "What you need to know"
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
On January 18, 1984, Oxendine’s girlfriend pushed Oxendine’s six year old son into the bathtub, causing tears in his intestines. When Oxendine came home from work, he saw bruises on the child and knew that the girlfriend had beaten the child during the day.
The next morning, Oxendine went into the boy’s bedroom and screamed at him to get up. A neighbor testified to hearing sounds of blows being struct, obscenities uttered by a male voice, and cries from a child saying, “Please stop, Daddy, it hurts.”
Later in the day, the boy’s abdomen became swollen. When Oxendine arrived home from work, the girlfriend urged him to take him to the hospital. Oxendine, believing that the boy was exaggerating, went out, bought a newspaper, and returned home to read it. Upon his return, the girlfriend had prepared to take the boy to the hospital. He was pronounced dead shortly after arriving at the hospital.
At trial, two medical experts testified that the boy’s death was caused by intra-abdominal hemorrhage, occurring as a result of blunt force trauma to the front of the abdomen. They each identified two distinct injuries, one caused more than twenty four hours before death and one inflicted less than twenty four hours before death. One expert could not separate the effects of the two injuries, and the other was of the opinion that the earlier injury was the underlying cause of death.
Oxendine was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to twelve years imprisonment.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.