Confirm favorite deletion?
Constitutional Law Keyed to Farber
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
Citation:567 U.S. 519 (2012)
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act expanded health care coverage for Americans One key provision was the individual mandate, which required most Americans to maintain minimum essential health insurance coverage. For individuals who were not exempt, and who didn’t receive health insurance through an employer or government program, the means of satisfying the requirement was to purchase insurance from a private company. Those who did not comply with the mandate must make a shared responsibility of payment to the Federal Government. The Act also expanded the Medicaid program to include adults with incomes up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level. The Act increased federal funding to cover the States’ costs in expanding Medicaid coverage. But if a State did not comply with the Act’s new coverage requirements, it might lose not only the federal funding for those requirements, but all of its federal Medicaid funds. Twenty-six states, several individuals and the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) brought suit in federal court challenging the constitutionality of the individual mandate and the Medicaid expansion.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.