SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Professional Responsibility Keyed to Gillers
NAACP v. Button
Citation:
371 U.S. 415 (1963)Facts
The NAACP had been actively involved in litigation challenging racial segregation in public schools following the Brown v. Board of Education decision. The organization maintained a legal staff and referred individuals seeking legal assistance to NAACP-affiliated attorneys. In response to these activities, Virginia enacted Chapter 33, which expanded the state’s definition of improper solicitation of legal business to include the NAACP’s practices. The NAACP challenged this law as an infringement on its First Amendment rights, arguing that its litigation activities were forms of political expression and association that could not be prohibited by the state. Virginia defended the law as a legitimate regulation of the legal profession designed to prevent unethical practices.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.