SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Commercial Law Keyed to Whaley
Mundaca Investment Corp. v. Febba
Citation:
727 A.2d 990 (1999)Facts
On July 28, 1987, Defendants serving as trustees of L.T.D. Realty Trust purchased two condominiums for the trust, financed by two promissory notes secured by mortgages on the condos. Both notes were signed by each defendant and each of them handwrote the word “Trustee” after their signature. The notes both stated that they are secured by a mortgage, the trust was not identified on the face of the notes. However, that trust is identified as the “Borrower” on both mortgage documents. On August 19, 1993, Mundaca acquired the two notes as the original bank went into receivership. Mundaca notified Defendants that they were in default on the notes and then sued to recover. Defendants argued that they were not personally liable on the notes because they had only signed in representative capacity as trustees for the L.T.D. Realty Trust. The trial court sided with Mundaca, finding Defendants failed to meet their burden of proving they had signed in representative capacity and failing to show that the original bank had not intended to hold them personally liable. Defendants appealed from this decision.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.