SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Remedies Keyed to Tabb, 8th
Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.
Citation:
398 U.S. 375, 90 S.Ct. 1772, 26 L.Ed.2d 339, 1970 AMC 967 (1970)Facts
Edward Moragne was employed as a longshoreman and died while performing his duties aboard the vessel Palmetto State, owned by States Marine Lines, Inc., in navigable waters within Florida’s territorial jurisdiction. His widow, as representative of his estate, brought suit in state court seeking damages for wrongful death and for pain and suffering experienced prior to death. The claims were based on both negligence and the vessel’s unseaworthiness. States Marine removed the case to federal court based on diversity of citizenship and filed a third-party complaint against Gulf Florida Terminal Company, Moragne’s employer, alleging that any negligence or unseaworthiness resulted from Gulf’s stevedoring operations. Both defendants moved to dismiss the unseaworthiness-based wrongful death claim, arguing that maritime law provided no such recovery in territorial waters and that Florida’s wrongful death statute did not encompass unseaworthiness.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.