Confirm favorite deletion?
Contracts Keyed to Kuney
Minnesota Linseed Oil Co. v. Collier White Lead Co.
Citation:17 F. Cas. 447 (1876).
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Beginning on July 29, 1875, plaintiff and defendant entered negotiations via telegraph for the sale of linseed oil. The market for linseed oil was very volatile and prices varied daily, ranging between 55 cents and 75 cents per gallon. On July 30, 1875, defendant requested three hundred barrels of oil for 55 cents per gallon. On July 31, 1875, plaintiff replied that it would accept 58 cents per gallon. The telegraph was transmitted at 9:15 p.m., but was not delivered to defendants until Monday, August 2 between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. On August 3, at 8:53 a.m. the defendants responded accepting the offer to ship 300 barrels for 58 cents per gallon. Plaintiff also sent a wire on August 3 withdrawing the offer of July 31, to which defendant responded that the withdrawal was not received until after acceptance and requesting shipment.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.