Confirm favorite deletion?
Criminal Procedure Keyed to Allen
Mincey v. Arizona
Citation:437 U.S. 385 (1978)
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
An undercover police officer for a narcotics squad knocked on the door of an apartment occupied by the Petitioner, Rufus Mincey. Prior to this, the officer had allegedly arranged to buy heroin from the Petitioner and had left to get money for the transaction. Upon returning, he came with another plain clothes officer and a county attorney. The door was opened by one of a few of Petitioner’s acquaintances who were in the living room of the apartment. The officer slipped inside and moved into the bedroom. The acquaintance attempted to slam the door to keep the other officer and the attorney from entering but was unsuccessful. As the two entered the apartment, a quick fire of shots were heard from the bedroom. The undercover officer emerged and collapsed on the floor. When the other officer and the attorney entered the bedroom, they found the Petitioner lying on the floor wounded and partially conscious. The undercover officer later died in the hospital. The other officer conducted a warrantless search of the crime scene.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.