StudyBuddy Pro
  • Law Study Aids
    • Case Briefs
    • Lessons
      • 1L
        • Civil Procedure
        • Constitutional Law
        • Contracts
        • Criminal Law
        • Property Law
        • Torts
      • 2L/3L
        • Business Organizations & Associations
        • Criminal Procedure
        • Evidence
        • Family Law
        • Secured Transactions
        • Wills, Trusts & Estates
    • Outlines
      • 1L
        • Civil Procedure
        • Constitutional Law
        • Contracts
        • Criminal Law
        • Property Law
        • Torts
      • 2L/3L
        • Agency
        • Business Organizations & Associations
        • Conflicts of Law
        • Corporations
        • Criminal Procedure
        • Evidence
        • Family Law
        • Intellectual Property
        • Partnerships
        • Secured Transactions
      • Exam Prep Checklists
        • Access 1L Checklists
          • Civil Procedure
          • Constitutional Law
          • Contracts
          • Criminal Law
          • Property Law
          • Torts
        • Access 2L/3L Checklists
          • Agency
          • Criminal Procedure
          • Corporations/Business Entities
          • Evidence
          • Family Law
          • Partnership
          • Trusts
          • U.C.C. ART. 9
          • Wills
    • Refresher Courses
      • 1L
        • Constitutional Law
        • Contracts Law
        • Criminal Law
        • Property Law
        • Torts Law
      • 2L/3L
        • Criminal Procedure
        • Evidence Law
    • Exam Prep Pro
      • 1L
        • Civil Procedure
        • Constitutional Law
        • Contracts
        • Criminal Law
        • Property Law
        • Torts
      • 2L/3L
        • Business Organizations & Associations
        • Conflicts of Law
        • Criminal Procedure
        • Evidence
        • Family Law
        • Secured Transactions
        • Wills, Trusts & Estates
    • Multiple Choice Quizzes
      • 1L
        • Civil Procedure
        • Constitutional Law
        • Contracts
        • Criminal Law
        • Property Law
        • Torts
      • 2L/3L
        • Business Organizations & Associations
        • Conflicts of Law
        • Criminal Procedure
        • Evidence
        • Family Law
        • Secured Transactions
        • Wills, Trusts & Estates
    • Exam Prep Workshops
      • 1L
        • Civil Procedure
        • Constitutional Law
        • Contracts
        • Criminal Law
        • Property Law
        • Torts
    • Charts and Notes
      • 1L
        • Civil Procedure
        • Constitutional Law
        • Contracts
        • Criminal Law
        • Property Law
        • Torts
      • 2L/3L
        • Criminal Procedure
        • Evidence
  • Courses
    • 1L Prep Course
  • Solutions
    • Professors and Institutions
    Generic selectors
    Exact matches only
    Search in title
    Search in content
    Post Type Selectors
    Advanced Search | Notes Search
    Start My FREE 7-DAY Trial
    Log In
    StuddyBuddy Pro
    Apple
    Facebook
    Google

    Forgot Password?

    Forgot Password?

    Forgotten Password

    Cancel

    Generic selectors
    Exact matches only
    Search in title
    Search in content
    Post Type Selectors

    • Law Study Aids
      • Case Briefs
      • Lessons
        • 1L
          • Civil Procedure
          • Constitutional Law
          • Contracts
          • Criminal Law
          • Property Law
          • Torts
        • 2L/3L
          • Business Organizations & Associations
          • Criminal Procedure
          • Evidence
          • Family Law
          • Secured Transactions
          • Wills, Trusts & Estates
      • Outlines
        • 1L
          • Civil Procedure
          • Constitutional Law
          • Contracts
          • Criminal Law
          • Property Law
          • Torts
        • 2L/3L
          • Agency
          • Business Organizations & Associations
          • Conflicts of Law
          • Corporations
          • Criminal Procedure
          • Evidence
          • Family Law
          • Intellectual Property
          • Partnerships
          • Secured Transactions
        • Exam Prep Checklists
          • Access 1L Checklists
            • Civil Procedure
            • Constitutional Law
            • Contracts
            • Criminal Law
            • Property Law
            • Torts
          • Access 2L/3L Checklists
            • Agency
            • Criminal Procedure
            • Corporations/Business Entities
            • Evidence
            • Family Law
            • Partnership
            • Trusts
            • U.C.C. ART. 9
            • Wills
      • Refresher Courses
        • 1L
          • Constitutional Law
          • Contracts Law
          • Criminal Law
          • Property Law
          • Torts Law
        • 2L/3L
          • Criminal Procedure
          • Evidence Law
      • Exam Prep Pro
        • 1L
          • Civil Procedure
          • Constitutional Law
          • Contracts
          • Criminal Law
          • Property Law
          • Torts
        • 2L/3L
          • Business Organizations & Associations
          • Conflicts of Law
          • Criminal Procedure
          • Evidence
          • Family Law
          • Secured Transactions
          • Wills, Trusts & Estates
      • Multiple Choice Quizzes
        • 1L
          • Civil Procedure
          • Constitutional Law
          • Contracts
          • Criminal Law
          • Property Law
          • Torts
        • 2L/3L
          • Business Organizations & Associations
          • Conflicts of Law
          • Criminal Procedure
          • Evidence
          • Family Law
          • Secured Transactions
          • Wills, Trusts & Estates
      • Exam Prep Workshops
        • 1L
          • Civil Procedure
          • Constitutional Law
          • Contracts
          • Criminal Law
          • Property Law
          • Torts
      • Charts and Notes
        • 1L
          • Civil Procedure
          • Constitutional Law
          • Contracts
          • Criminal Law
          • Property Law
          • Torts
        • 2L/3L
          • Criminal Procedure
          • Evidence
    • Courses
      • 1L Prep Course
    • Solutions
      • Professors and Institutions
    Start My FREE 7-DAY Trial
    Log In Sign up
    StuddyBuddy Pro
    Apple
    Facebook
    Google

    Forgot Password?

    Forgot Password?

    Forgotten Password

    Cancel
    SmartBrief enables case brief popups that define Key Terms, Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises used in this case.

    SmartBrief

    A.I Enhanced Margin Brief to quickly recall case brief A.I Enhanced Margin Brief to quickly recall case brief 0

    Sections to print





    To print, please Start a Free Trial or Log in.

    Confirm favorite deletion?

    Cancel Yes, Delete

    Criminal Law Keyed to Gershowitz

    View this case in different Casebooks
    Criminal Law Keyed to DresslerCriminal Law Keyed to Gershowitz

    Midgett v. State

    Citation:

    292 Ark. 278, 729 S.W.2d 410.
    Start Your Free Trial or Log in.

    Facts

    The defendant had a son, Ronnie Midgett, Jr., who was eight years old. The evidence showed that Ronnie Jr. had been abused by brutal beating over a substantial period of time. Ronnie Jr. would not say how he had obtained the bruises or why he was so lethargic at school except to blame it all on a rough playing little brother. On a Wednesday, the child died. The other children in the house were not being physically abused by the defendant.

    Ronnie Jr.’s sister, Sherry, aged ten, testified that on the Saturday preceding Ronnie Jr.’s death, their father was drinking whiskey and beating on Ronnie Jr. She testified that the defendant would “bundle up his fist” and hit Ronnie Jr. in the stomach and in the back. She said the bruises on Ronnie Jr.’s body noticed over the preceding six months had been caused by the defendant.

    On the Wednesday that Ronnie Jr. died, the defendant appeared at a hospital carrying the body. He told hospital personnel something was wrong with the child. An autopsy was performed, and it showed Ronnie Jr. was a very poorly nourished and underdeveloped for an eight-year-old. There were recently caused bruises on the lips, center of the chest plate, and forehead as well as on the back part of the lateral chest wall, the soft tissue near the spine, and the buttocks. There was discoloration of the abdominal wall and prominent bruising on the palms of the hands. Older bruises were found on the right temple, under the chin, and on the left mandible. Recent as well as older, healed, rib fractures were found. The conclusion of the medical examiner was that Ronnie Jr. died as the result of intra-abdominal hemorrhage caused by a blunt force trauma consistent with having been delivered by a human fist.

    The defendant was convicted of first degree murder. He appealed, arguing that there is no evidence that he killed Ronnie Jr. with premeditation and deliberation.

    Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*

    Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.

    *Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue

    • The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
    • Topic:

      Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
    • Parties:

      Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
    • Procedural Posture & History:

      Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
    • Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:

      A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
    • Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:

      Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
    Start Your Free Trial or Log in.
    • The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
    • Brief Facts:

      A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
    • Rule of Law:

      Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
    • Facts:

      What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.
    • Issue(s):

      Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
    • Holding:

      Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
    • Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:

      Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
    • Reasoning and Analysis:

      Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
    Start Your Free Trial or Log in.
    • The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
    • Policy:

      Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
    • Court Direction:

      Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
    Start Your Free Trial or Log in.

    Case Quiz

    Retake Attempts
    Question 1 of 3

    Results

    0 of 3 Questions answered correctly.

    Results

    Quiz complete. Results are being recorded.
    Q.1 - On the Arkansas Supreme Court’s reading in Midgett v. State, which description most precisely captures the limits it places on inferring “premeditation and deliberation” from a pattern of chronic child abuse?
    Start Your Free Trial or Log in.
    Incorrect. This is wrong because the Court explicitly refuses to treat the sheer repetition or brutality of abuse as sufficient to infer premeditation.
    Incorrect. This is wrong because vulnerability and power disparity are morally salient but not taken as dispositive proof of a homicidal mental state.
    Incorrect. This is wrong because the majority does not collapse intent to cause serious injury into intent to kill, and it rejects the idea that eventual foreseeability alone satisfies premeditation.
    Correct! This is correct because the Midgett majority insists that the statutory elements of “premeditation and deliberation” require proof of a formed, conscious purpose to kill, and that such a purpose cannot simply be inferred from an intent to continue harsh, even savage, corporal punishment. The Court treats the father’s mens rea as oriented toward ongoing abuse rather than a separately identifiable decision to bring about the child’s death, thereby confining first-degree murder to cases with clearer homicidal design.
    Q.2 - Which characterization best describes the Midgett majority’s interpretive stance toward the Arkansas homicide statute in modifying the conviction from first-degree to second-degree murder?
    Start Your Free Trial or Log in.
    Incorrect. This is wrong because the Court does not revive broad common-law “malice aforethought” to expand first-degree murder; it constrains, rather than extends, that category.
    Correct! This is correct because the majority reads “premeditation” narrowly and textually, declining to interpret it as a catch-all for extreme moral blameworthiness and instead insisting that any enlargement of first-degree liability for abuse deaths must come from the legislature, not from judicial reconstruction. This reflects a legislature-deferential, quasi-positivist approach that keeps the judiciary from transforming cruelty or outrage into a substitute for the specific statutory mental state.
    Incorrect. This is wrong because the opinion expressly resists aligning degrees of murder with community outrage alone and ties them instead to statutory mens rea definitions.
    Incorrect. This is wrong because the Court does not invoke public policy to enhance punishment; it effectively invites, rather than performs, any future legislative recalibration.
    Q.3 - In terms of modern criminal theory and legislative design, what is the most accurate doctrinal implication of Midgett v. State for jurisdictions lacking a separate “child abuse homicide” or “murder by abuse” statute?
    Start Your Free Trial or Log in.
    Correct! This is correct because Midgett illustrates that, under a framework where first-degree murder hinges on demonstrable premeditation, even horrific, lethal child abuse may be judicially classified as second-degree if the evidence does not establish a discrete intent to kill—highlighting a doctrinal gap that specialized “murder by abuse” statutes are designed to fill. The case thus serves as a paradigmatic example of how traditional degree structures can under-punish abuse-driven homicides unless legislatures create tailored offenses capturing the unique dynamics of prolonged child abuse.
    Incorrect. This is wrong because the outcome in Midgett shows precisely that traditional first-degree provisions may fail to encompass chronic abuse homicides at the highest degree.
    Incorrect. This is wrong because the Court does not reduce all fatal abuse to manslaughter nor does it require an explicit verbal threat as a condition of higher liability.
    Incorrect. This is wrong because nothing in Midgett suggests a constitutional bar to later statutory innovation; if anything, the decision underscores the space and need for legislative reform.

    MarginBrief™ Case overview for optimal recall

    A.I Enhanced Margin Brief to quickly recall case brief
    A.I Enhanced Margin Brief to quickly recall case brief

    Generating...

    Facts:

    Quickly review the Facts of this case including its key ideas for optimal understanding and recall.

    Quickly review the Facts of this case including its key ideas for optimal understanding and recall.

    Issue:

    Utilize our powerful A.I. tools to easily capture and understand the Issue in this case.

    Utilize our powerful A.I. tools to easily capture and understand the Issue in this case.

    Rule:

    Easily understand the Rule in this case so you have a complete and thorough appreciation for overall case concepts completely tying together what occurred, the court’s questions and the case outcome.

    Easily understand the Rule in this case so you have a complete and thorough appreciation for overall case concepts completely tying together what occurred, the court’s questions and the case outcome.

    Start Your Free Trial or Log in.

    Topic Resources

    ™ CaseCast

    Scott Caron

    ProfessorScott Caron

    CaseCast™ "What you need to know"

    CaseCast™ –  "What you need to know"

    play_circle_filled
    pause_circle_filled
    Midgett v. State
    volume_down
    volume_up
    volume_off
    To continue listening to this CaseCast™ please Subscribe

    Topic Videos

    Midgett v. State14m 23s
    See complete Lesson, Quizzes and More
    Midgett v. State9m 36s
    See complete Lesson, Quizzes and More
    Midgett v. State6m 45s
    See complete Lesson, Quizzes and More

    Topic Outline

    Homicide

    Topic Refresher Course

    Conspiracy; Introduction to Homicide and Murder Part 1

    Topic Charts & Notes

    Homicide Chart

    Status:

    Your Law School
    Success Begins Here

    • Case Briefs - the Socratic Savior! – Best in class and Largest Library of complete I.R.A.C. / C.R.E.A.C. Law School case briefs. Includes:
      • SmartBriefs® - Enhanced case briefs for optimal clarity
      • New Case Videos - Explained and Summarized for optimal case understanding
      • CaseCast® - Professor overviews of "What you need to know"
      • New MarginBrief® - A.I. - Powered for faster, more efficient case recall
    • Lessons - Professor delivered video for topic reinforcement
    • Outlines - Professor written - downloadable, amendable and includes test-taking tips and tools
    • New Case Quiz - Reinforce case principles, instantly scored
    • Refresher Courses - Quick course reviews with interactive exercises
    • Quizzes and Exams - over 5,000 Multiple Choice and Essay questions all Professor curated and answered
    • New My Reviewer™ - Instantly receive a Score, Critique and Feedback on your legal writing
    • Exam Prep Workshops - Delivered by Professors on how to disect, organize and answer law school exam questions
    • and so much more ...
    Start your FREE Trial

    Notepad Click anywhere in notepad to add a note

    Midgett v. State