Confirm favorite deletion?
Business Associations Keyed to Bainbridge
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. RJR Nabisco, Inc.
Citation:716 F.Supp. 1504 (S.D.N.Y.1989)
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. is a life insurance company that provides pension benefits. MetLife alleges that it owns $340,542,000 in principal amount of RJR Nabisco debt issues, bonds allegedly purchased. RJR Nabisco is a consumer products holding company. The bonds implicated by this suit are governed by long, detailed indentures that are governed by New York contract law. The prospectuses for the indentures contain a statement: the indenture contains no restrictions on the creation of unsecured short-term debt by RJR Nabisco, no restriction on the creation of unsecured funded debt by RJR Nabisco and no restriction on the payment of dividends by RJR Nabisco. In its complaint, MetLife lists six debt issues on which it bases its claims. Indentures for two of those issues restricted the company’s ability to incur the sort of debt involved in the recent LBO.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.