Confirm favorite deletion?
Contracts Keyed to Kuney
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer v. Scheider
Citation:347 N.Y.S.2d 755, 75 Misc. 2d 418 (1972).
MGM, under an agreement with American Broadcasting Company (ABC), produced the pilot film “Munich Project” with the hopes a television series would be produced based on the film. ABC exercised its option requiring MGM to produce a series for broadcast beginning September 1972. It is a custom in the industry for filming of a series set to air in the fall to begin in the spring.
On September 30, 1971, MGM and Scheider agreed that (1) Scheider would appear in and be paid $20,000 for the pilot film; (2) Scheider would be paid per episode, for any TV series that might result from the film: $5,000 the first year, $6,000 the second year, $7,000 the third year, $9,500 the fourth year, and $11,500 the fifth year; (3) if the pilot film resulted in a series, MGM would have a one-year option from date of completion of the pilot for Scheider’s services. In February 1972, negotiations continued between MGM and Scheider’s attorneys and all of terms were substantially agreed to except for a starting date.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
Parties:Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
Procedural Posture & History:Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
Rule of Law:Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
Facts:What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.
Issue(s):Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
Holding:Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
Reasoning and Analysis:Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.