Confirm favorite deletion?
Business Associations Keyed to Bainbridge
McConnell v. Hunt Sports Enterprises
Citation:132 Ohio App.3d 657, 725 N.E.2d 1193 (1999)
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
On October, 1996, several wealthy individuals and their controlled entities formed Columbus Hockey Limited, LLC (CHL) for the purpose of seeking a National Hockey League Franchise for Columbus Ohio. John H. McConnell and Lamar Hunt were two investors in CHL. Nationwide made a proposal for the lease for an arena, which Hunt rejected. The CHL investors met. Hunt stated that he found Nationwide’s lease offer unacceptable, while McConnell accepted the lease offer and signed an agreement in their own names. On June, 1997, the NHL expansion committee recommended that the Columbus franchise be awarded to McConnell’s group. The McConnell group filed the present suit seeking a declaratory judgment to establish its legal right to the franchise without inclusion of Hunt.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.