SmartBrief
0
Confirm favorite deletion?
Contracts Keyed to Burton
Masterson v. Sine
Citation:
68 Cal. 2d 222, 65 Cal. Rptr. 545, 436 P.2d 561Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Dallas and Rebecca Masterson (collectively “the Mastersons”) (plaintiffs) owned a ranch. The Mastersons conveyed the ranch to Medora and Lu Sine (collectively “the Sines”) (defendants) but reserved the option to buy back the property within ten years. The grant deed stated that the Mastersons could exercise this option by paying the same amount of consideration as was provided by the Sines, minus any depreciation in the value of the property. Dallas entered bankruptcy and his trustee, Rebecca, sued the Sines to establish their right to enforce the option. The trial court admitted extrinsic evidence showing that the “consideration” mentioned in the agreement was $50,000, and that any “deprecation in value” referred to depreciation allowable to them under United States income tax regulations as of the time of the exercise of the option. The trial court also concluded that the parol evidence rule precluded the admission of extrinsic evidence of an oral agreement that the option was not assignable to Rebecca as trustee because the parties intended the property to be kept within the Masterson family.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
13m 45s
