SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Art Law Keyed to Gerstenblith, 4th Ed.
Martin v. City of Indianapolis
Citation:
192 F.3d 608 (1999)Facts
Jan Randolph Martin, an artist with degrees from Purdue University, the Art Institute of Chicago, and Bowling Green State University, worked as production coordinator for Tarpenning-LaFollette Company, a metal contracting firm. In 1984, Martin received permission from the Indianapolis Metropolitan Development Commission to erect a large metal sculpture on land owned by his employer’s chairman, John LaFollette. The Company furnished materials for the project. A Project Agreement between the City and the Company granted a zoning variance and specified that if the sculpture needed to be removed, the City would provide ninety days’ written notice to the landowner and sculpture owner. Martin completed “Symphony #1,” a twenty-by-forty-foot stainless steel sculpture, in approximately two years, engineering it to be disassembled and reassembled if removal became necessary. The sculpture received favorable attention from the press and art community. In April 1992, the City notified LaFollette of plans to acquire the property for urban renewal. Martin and his brother offered to donate the sculpture to the City if it would bear removal costs, but the City failed to provide the contractually required notice and demolished Symphony #1 without warning.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.