Confirm favorite deletion?
Civil Procedure Keyed to Glannon
MacArthur v. University of Texas Health Center at Tyler
Citation:45 F.3d 890 (5th Cir. 1995)
MacArthur asserted five claims against Defendants–retaliation under the First Amendment, sex discrimination, intentional infliction of emotional distress, violation of Equal Protection Clause, and retaliation under Title VII. Three of the claims were presented to the jury; MacArthur prevailed on the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim. The district court dismissed all but the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, pursuant to the verdict returned by the jury. MacArthur filed a motion for a new trial, which was denied. She filed a notice of appeal challenging the dismissal of her claims.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
Parties:Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
Procedural Posture & History:Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
Rule of Law:Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
Facts:What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.
Issue(s):Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
Holding:Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
Reasoning and Analysis:Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.