SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
California Legal Ethics Keyed to Wydick, 12th Ed.
Kwasnik v. State Bar of California
Citation:
50 Cal. 3d 1061, 269 Cal. Rptr. 749, 791 P.2d 319 (1990)Facts
Richard Kwasnik graduated from Brooklyn Law School in 1966 and was admitted to practice in New York in 1967. In 1970, he was involved in an automobile accident while driving impaired that resulted in the death of Steven Smilanich, a husband and father of three children. A wrongful death judgment of $232,234 was entered against him in 1974. His insurance paid $10,000, and Kwasnik made no payments until garnishment proceedings were initiated in 1975, after which he paid only the minimum required to avoid garnishment ($42 biweekly). Between 1975 and 1980, he paid only $4,685 despite earning between $15,000 and $32,000 annually and living rent-free.
In 1979, Kwasnik falsely testified in a deposition that he had no joint bank accounts. In his Florida Bar application, he misrepresented his payment history and intentions. In 1980, he moved to Florida (where wages were exempt from garnishment), stopped making payments, and filed for bankruptcy, listing only the wrongful death judgment as a debt to be discharged. The Florida Bar initially denied his admission based on his pattern of misrepresentations and evasion, but the Florida Supreme Court later admitted him in 1988, finding he had demonstrated rehabilitation.
In California, the State Bar hearing panel recommended admission, but the Review Department disagreed, finding Kwasnik lacked good moral character based on his conduct surrounding the judgment and bankruptcy. Kwasnik presented fifteen character reference letters from judges, attorneys, and a pastor, and had no disciplinary record in over 20 years of practice in New York.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.