SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Commercial Law Keyed to Whaley
Knop v. Knop
Citation:
297 Va. 553, 830 S.E.2d 723 (2019)Facts
The Knop family business, Ticonderoga Farms, was incorporated in 1982 with the father having 80% ownership and the remainder being split between his wife and their three children. After the couple separated in 1987, and additional transfers by the now adult children, the Knop children each owned 9.08% of the business, collectively owning 27.24%. In 2004, the father contacted the company’s tax accountant and informed him of his intent to make an inter vivos gift of additional stock in the company to his three children. The father instructed the accountant that he wanted to give to his children gifts of stock equivalent to the maximum gift tax exclusion, which would have brought each child’s ownership interest in the company to 14.687%, or 44.061% collectively.
Later, the father would decide he wanted to sell or give away part of the company’s land to create a scenic easement. While the company’s bylaws prevented the transfer of land without approval of 90% of the ownership interest, the father was able to take advantage of a Virginia law that allowed corporations to convert to another form of governance if done so by a shareholder owning more than two-thirds interest in the company. The father used this law to convert the business into an LLC and change the bylaws to give himself complete control over the business and transfer the land. The Knop children sued, arguing that the father did not have two-thirds interest because they collectively owned 44.061%. The father contended that the gifts of stock were never actually or constructively delivered to his children, so they still owned only 27.24% of the company, leaving him with 72.76%. The Knop children sued the father seeking a declaratory judgment as to their ownership interests.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
Topic Resources
Topic Refresher Course