SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Securities Regulation, Keyed to Choi
Kirschner v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Citation:
79 F.4th 290 (2023)Facts
Millennium Health LLC, a California-based urine drug testing company, obtained a $310 million loan in March 2012 from JP Morgan Chase and other financial institutions under a credit agreement. Two days before closing, the Department of Justice issued a subpoena to Millennium investigating potential violations of federal health care laws. Millennium was also involved in litigation with competitor Ameritox Ltd. regarding alleged violations of federal anti-kickback statutes. By February 2014, JP Morgan determined that refinancing required a large institutional financing to eliminate the approximately $300 million still owed under the 2012 Credit Agreement. On March 16, 2014, JP Morgan and other Initial Lenders agreed to provide Millennium a $1.775 billion term loan and $50 million revolving loan. Millennium planned to use the term loan proceeds to pay the outstanding 2012 debt ($304 million), make shareholder distributions ($1.27 billion), redeem warrants and stock options ($196 million), and pay transaction fees ($45 million). The Initial Lenders agreed to syndicate the loan to other lenders identified by Lead Arrangers JP Morgan Securities and Citigroup Global Markets. A Confidential Information Memorandum was prepared for potential lenders, containing numerous disclaimers and warnings that recipients should perform independent investigations and represented they were sophisticated in extending credit. On April 15, 2014, JP Morgan notified potential lenders of their allocations, which became irrevocable commitments. Sixty-one Parent Lenders received allocations, with fifty-nine domestic and two foreign entities, who then sub-allocated to approximately 400 Child Lenders, roughly half of which were foreign entities. The transaction closed April 16, 2014, with JP Morgan initially funding 100% of the term loan and then assigning rights to the lenders. The Credit Agreement required quarterly payments over seven years and created a perfected first priority security interest in Millennium’s assets as collateral. Assignment restrictions prohibited transfers to natural persons, required written consent from Millennium and JP Morgan (with exceptions), and required minimum assignment amounts of $1 million unless to existing lenders or approved funds. A secondary market for the notes began trading as early as April 15, 2014. In June 2014, a jury found Millennium violated federal anti-kickback statutes and awarded damages to Ameritox. In December 2014, DOJ informed Millennium it would intervene in qui tam litigation, doing so in March 2015. Millennium reached a $256 million settlement with the government in October 2015 and filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on November 10, 2015.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.