SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Contracts Keyed to Blum
Kent State University v. Ford
Citation:
26 N.E.3d 868 (2015)Facts
In April 2008, Plaintiff and Defendant executed an employment contract employing Defendant as head men’s basketball coach for four years with an option for a fifth year. The contract contained a provision that stated that Defendant recognized his promise to work for Plaintiff for the term of the contract. Additionally, the provision said that if he resigned or terminated his contract with Plaintiff before the expiration date, he would have to pay liquidated damages equal to his base and supplemental salary, multiplied by the remaining number of years on the contract. The contract also provided that if Defendant terminated his employment before expiration and is employed for a person or institution other than Plaintiff, he would pay an amount equal to the balance of the then-current total annual salary due for the remaining amount of the contract term.
In 2010, both parties renegotiated and executed a new employment contract for a five-year term, increasing his total salary to $300k, which contained the same liquidated damages provision. In 2011, Plaintiff’s athletic director received a call from Defendant’s agent requesting permission for Defendant to speak to other schools for employment. Plaintiff’s athletic director granted Defendant permission but reminded Defendant of the damages provision. However, Defendant accepted a position at Bradley for an annual salary of $700k, and Plaintiff hired Coach Senderoff to replace him. Several of Plaintiff’s employees testified that the liquidated damages clause protected the coach and Plaintiff’s investment in the coach and program. Additionally, they believed that other universities included similar liquidated damages clauses in their contracts.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
Topic Resources
Topic Outline
Topic Refresher Course
9m 25s