SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Contracts Keyed to Fuller
Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.
Citation:
709 P.2d 837 (1985)Facts
The City of San Jose owned property at the San Jose Municipal Airport, which it leased to Irving and Janice Perlitch, who later assigned their interest to defendant Ernest Pestana, Inc. Prior to this assignment, the Perlitches had entered into a 25-year sublease with Robert Bixler commencing on January 1, 1970, covering an original five-year term plus four 5-year options to renew. The sublease provided that the rental rate would increase every 10 years proportional to increases in the master lease. Bixler operated an airplane maintenance business on the premises until 1981, when he agreed to sell the business to plaintiffs, including an assignment of the lease. The proposed assignees had stronger financial statements and greater net worth than Bixler and were willing to be bound by the lease terms. The lease required written consent from the lessor before assignment, which Bixler requested from Pestana. Pestana refused consent, claiming an absolute right to refuse arbitrarily, and demanded increased rent and more onerous terms as a condition of consent.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.