SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Property Keyed to Merrill
Jost v. Dairyland Power Cooperative
Citation:
172 N.W.2d 647Facts
The plaintiff brought the action for damages for injury to crops and loss of market value of farm lands. The plaintiffs are farmers living within the city limits of Alma, Wisconsin. Their farms are located on the bluffs overlooking the Mississippi River. In 1947, the Dairyland Power Cooperative erected a coal burning electric generating plant at Alma. The farmers contended that consumption of high-sulfur-content coal at this plant has increased from 300 tons per day in 1948 to 1,670 tons per day in 1967. There was testimony that the 1967 coal consumption resulted in discharging approximately 90 tons of sulfur-dioxide gas into the atmosphere each day. Defendant’s witness, a farmer who was hit less frequently by the sulphurous fumes, estimated his crops damage at 5 percent. Each plaintiff farmer testified that his land had diminished in value as the result of the continuing crop loss. Defendant offered testimony of realtors to the effect that there had been no diminution of market value.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.