SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Criminal Law keyed to Dripps
Jacobson v. United States
Citation:
503 U.S. 540, 112 S.Ct. 1535, 118 L.Ed.2d 174.Facts
In February 1984, petitioner, a 56-year-old Nebraskan farmer, ordered two magazines and a brochure from a California adult bookstore. The magazines were entitled Bare Boys I and Bare Boys II. Petitioner testified that he had expected to receive images of young men 18 or older and was shocked to see pictures of very young boys. Three months after receiving the magazines, the law changed making it illegal to receive sexually explicit images of children through the mail. Postal inspectors found petitioner’s name on a mailing list for the bookstore and, for the next 2 and 1/2 years, there were repeated efforts by two Government agencies to explore petitioner’s willingness to break the new law. Communications from the Postal Service included letters from fictitious organizations and a fake pen pal and Customs Service also included petitioner in its own child pornography sting using a fictitious Canadian company. Finally, the Postal Service sent petitioner a letter from the “Far Eastern Trading Company Ltd.” regarding American media’s “hysterical nonsense” over “‘pornography'” and the “millions of dollars” the government was spending to exercise “international censorship.” Petitioner responded to the letter requesting more information and signing an affirmation he was not a government agent. Petitioner was then sent a catalog and ordered a pornographic magazine entitled Boys Who Love Boys. Petitioner was arrested during a controlled delivery of a photocopy of the magazine. At trial, petitioner testified that the Government had succeeded in piquing his curiosity due to its comments about censorship. Other than the Bare Boys magazines and the Government’s own communications, no other materials were found in petitioner’s home to suggest an active interest in child pornography.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
Topic Resources
Topic Outline
Defenses