SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Business Planning Keyed to Reed
In re Trados Inc. Shareholder Litigation
Citation:
73 A. 3d 17 (2013)Facts
Trados Inc. developed translation software and by 2000 had secured venture capital funding from several firms, including Wachovia, Hg Capital, Sequoia, and Invision. These VC firms received preferred stock with liquidation preferences and placed representatives on Trados’s board of directors. By 2004, despite growing revenues, Trados had not met the VC firms’ return expectations. The VC directors began seeking an exit strategy.
In July 2004, the board hired Joseph Campbell as CEO with the mission to either grow the company or sell it. The board also adopted a Management Incentive Plan (MIP) that would compensate management for achieving a sale even if the transaction yielded nothing for common stockholders. Under Campbell’s leadership, Trados’s performance improved with record revenues and profits in late 2004 and early 2005.
In February 2005, SDL offered to acquire Trados for $60 million, consisting of $50 million in cash and $10 million in SDL stock. Under Trados’s certificate of incorporation, this merger constituted a liquidation event entitling preferred stockholders to a liquidation preference of $57.9 million. The MIP took the first $7.8 million of the merger consideration, the preferred stockholders received $52.2 million, and common stockholders received nothing. The board, composed of two management directors, three VC fund representatives, and two outside directors, unanimously approved the merger in June 2005.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.