SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Professional Responsibility Keyed to Gillers
In re Ryder
Citation:
263 F. Supp. 360 (1967)Facts
Richard R. Ryder, an attorney, was representing Charles R. Caron, who was charged with bank robbery. After learning that Caron had a safe deposit box containing stolen money and a sawed-off shotgun used in the robbery, Ryder transferred these items to his own safe deposit box. Ryder claimed he did this to protect the items under attorney-client privilege until he could determine the proper legal course of action. The FBI discovered this transfer during their investigation. When confronted, Ryder maintained that he believed his actions were legal and ethical, asserting that the items were protected communications from his client. The court rejected this argument, finding that physical evidence of crimes cannot be concealed by attorneys under the guise of privilege.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.