SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Administrative Law Keyed to Breyer
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha
Citation:
462 U.S. 919 (1983)Facts
Jagdish Rai Chadha was admitted to the United States in 1966 on a nonimmigrant student visa which expired in 1972. In deportation proceedings, he conceded deportability but applied for suspension of deportation under §244(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The Immigration Judge found that Chadha met all statutory requirements: continuous residence for over seven years, good moral character, and that deportation would cause “extreme hardship.” The Attorney General recommended suspension of deportation. As required by §244(c)(2), this recommendation was reported to Congress. On December 12, 1975, the House of Representatives passed a resolution disapproving the suspension without debate or recorded vote, effectively vetoing the Attorney General’s decision. Consequently, deportation proceedings were reopened, and Chadha was ordered deported. Chadha challenged the constitutionality of the one-House veto provision, arguing it violated the separation of powers doctrine.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.