SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Constitutional Law Keyed to Maggs
Home Building & Loan Ass’n v. Blaisdell
Citation:
290 U.S. 398 (1934)Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
In 1933, during the Great Depression, Minnesota enacted a Mortgage Moratorium Law, which authorized parties facing foreclosure to obtain from a court an extension of the time during which the mortgagee could not foreclose and an extension of the period of redemption after foreclosure. Extensions could be granted only until 1935, after which the statute would no longer be in effect. Extensions were conditioned upon the mortgagor’s making continued payments, determined by the reasonable income or rental value of the property, to help to defray the cost of taxes, insurance and the like. The Blaisdells obtained an order extending the contractual redemption period from 1932 to 1935 on the condition that they pay $40 per month to appellant, the mortgagee, during the extended period. Appellant challenged the constitutionality of the Act under the Contract Clause.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
3m 50s
