Confirm favorite deletion?
Contracts Keyed to Murray
Hickman v. SAFECO Insurance Company
Facts
Hickman (Plaintiff) obtained a mortgage on his home. The mortgage was later assigned to Guaranty (Defendant). When Plaintiff failed to insure the home as required under the mortgage agreement, Guaranty obtained insurance from SAFECO Insurance Company (Defendant). The policy covered losses on the home, other structures, and the personal property of the “borrower” and the borrower’s family. Payments for losses on the home and other structures were to be paid to Guaranty up to the amount of its interest in the property, with the excess payable to the borrower. Payments for losses related to personal property were to be paid directly to the borrower. The policy also allowed the borrower to seek arbitration on any appraisal of loss determined by SAFECO. The insurance premiums were paid from an escrow account funded from Plaintiff’s monthly mortgage payments. Plaintiff’s home was damaged in a storm. SAFECO paid out a claim to Guaranty for more than the outstanding balance of the mortgage, and Guaranty paid the excess to Plaintiff. Plaintiff objected to the amount of the payment under the policy and sued Defendants. The district court granted SAFECO’s motion for summary judgment, and the court of appeals affirmed. The Minnesota Supreme Court granted review on the question of whether Plaintiff was a third-party beneficiary of the insurance contract under the intent-to-benefit test.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.