SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Corporations Keyed to Hazen
Hewlett v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
Citation:
2002 WL 818091 (Del. Ch. 2002)Facts
In the spring of 2001, HP began to consider the prospect of acquiring and merging with Compaq. The merger was announced publicly on September 4 and HP made its first public statements about the financial effects of the merger. On November 6, 2001, Hewlett publicly announced his opposition to the merger. In early March, Hewlett and HP were actively engaged in the proxy contest and each was trying to secure as many vote as possible. The plaintiffs allege that HP improperly enticed or coerced Deutsche Bank to vote in favor of the merger by using the carrot of potential future business. Voting decisions for shares held by the Deutsche Bank management are made by a five-member committee known as the Proxy Working Group. For much of the proxy contest, HP management and Hewlett’s advisors believed that the Deutsche Bank management would follow its common practice and vote its shares. Following the special meeting, HP management publicly claimed that the HP shareholders had approved the proposed merger by a slim but sufficient margin. The lawsuit was filed on March 28, 2002.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
Topic Resources
Topic Outline
Corporate Liability